Curt
Full Member
Posts: 136
|
Post by Curt on Sept 6, 2005 18:54:36 GMT -8
Mark, I accept your explanation. I knew it came from your strong belief. I know it seems to some that a doing away of any part of the law seems disrespectful. It is difficult for me to argue the point with someone who wants to keep all of what they believe is God's law. It is much easier to argue with someone who doesn't want to keep any of God's law. Your right, there is many more people who reject scripture in any form and they need to be reached. I like to reach them also but it is on a different level than here on this web site. It seems most on this web site are feeding on solid food of scripture rather than just beginning with the milk of scripture. So in addition I like to do as the Bereans did and test every scripture to see if it was so. Acts 17:11 (New Kings James Version) 11 These were more fair-minded than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the word with all readiness, and searched the Scriptures daily to find out whether these things were so I also apologize for taking so long. I am worse than anyone at that. I did see that others were also encouraged to voice their opinion. I will respond to your other comments as soon as I'm able.
|
|
|
Post by Ashirah on Feb 27, 2006 21:28:58 GMT -8
Could it be that Yeshua came to restore to the way it was before it became corrupted by the 'traditions of men'. Did Yeshua come to lighten the load and make it possible for everyone to do what was given before?
|
|
Pioneer
Full Member
Shema and Shemar
Posts: 210
|
Post by Pioneer on Mar 1, 2006 12:56:45 GMT -8
Could it be that Yeshua came to restore to the way it was before it became corrupted by the 'traditions of men'. Did Yeshua come to lighten the load and make it possible for everyone to do what was given before? Welcome ashirah, Yeah, just about, He is the breechmaker that lets the kingdom go to all the nations!
|
|
|
Post by R' Y'hoshua Moshe on Mar 4, 2006 2:11:03 GMT -8
He did a little bit of both. In some cases He lightened the load where it didn't need to be too heavy. But, in same cases He restored the load to it's proper weight (if you know what I mean). Shalom chaverim, Reuel
|
|
|
Post by Nachshon on Jun 20, 2006 6:35:54 GMT -8
Matthew 5:17-18 is probably the most consistently mistranslated passage in Scripture. As of yet, I have found one translation from the Greek that even begins to get it right; the NEB. The KJV has it as, "Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled." What this translation does not reveal is that there are two different words translated 'fulfill.' This difference is also seen in the ancient Aramaic texts. The first word translated "fulfill" is 'pleroo' meaning 'fulfill' or, in the Hebrew sense, give a greater meaning to, or properly interpret. In the second instance it is the term 'ginomahi,' quite a different word. The illustrious Authorised Version translates this word 'be' 255 times, 'come to pass' 82 times, 'be made' 69 times, etc., etc., etc. It only translates it 'fulfill' thrice. Other versions (NEB, ALTB, etc) properly translate it 'happen' or 'occur' two or three of those three times. This does not mean 'fulfill' but 'occur.' He is saying that one yood or one tittel will not pass from the until everything that is going to happen has happened. For those that may be Aramaic primacists, the first term in Aramaic is the term for 'fulfill' and the second is literally 'turn,' an idiom for 'happen' or 'occur.' Shalom, David
|
|
|
Post by R' Y'hoshua Moshe on Jun 22, 2006 17:12:35 GMT -8
Shalom brother and thank you for sharing! I think that the context here is also important. In Rabbinic writings the phrase "destroying the " is used to describe someone whom misinterprets and issues a bad teaching from it. In this case when Yeshua says that He is in fact not doing this, but that He is coming to complete it, fulfill it, or what you mentioned, "give a greater meaning to, or properly interpret.", I believe this is the accurate interpretation of this passage. But, I think your interpretation is also relevant. Blessings in Messiah, Reuel
|
|
Curt
Full Member
Posts: 136
|
Post by Curt on Jul 26, 2006 11:22:33 GMT -8
Curt: I feel is not the right word to use here. After all the contains two seperate sets of law. God's Law (Ten Commandments) and Moses Law. Jesus prefaces which law in verses Matt. 5:21-37 and it's called the Ten Commandments.
|
|
|
Post by messimom on Jul 26, 2006 12:57:13 GMT -8
Lately, I have been reading along just enjoying the posts and knowledge I have gained from those more learned from me. Anything I have personally disagreed with I have said nothing about, deferring to those who can put it so much more eloquently. However, this time I feel compelled to disagree based on my limited knowledge. Maybe I'm wrong, but I'm going to present my understanding for consideration. I know many of you simply look up the verses presented and go from there, but I like to have the verses included for easier discussion, so bear with me please. 21: "You have heard that it was said to the men of old, `You shall not kill; and whoever kills shall be liable to judgment.' 22: But I say to you that every one who is angry with his brother shall be liable to judgment; whoever insults his brother shall be liable to the council, and whoever says, `You fool!' shall be liable to the hell of fire.
Do not murder--comandment $#6. Punishment for commandment number six listed.....not there. The punishment given by Yeshua here ( judgment by council/hell of fire) is listed nowhere in the Ten commandments, it is listed in the "Mosaic laws"
23: So if you are offering your gift at the altar, and there remember that your brother has something against you, 24: leave your gift there before the altar and go; first be reconciled to your brother, and then come and offer your gift.
The altar sacrifices are only listed and detailed in the Mosaic laws. The ten commandments have nothing to say about the sacrificial system.
25: Make friends quickly with your accuser, while you are going with him to court, lest your accuser hand you over to the judge, and the judge to the guard, and you be put in prison; 26: truly, I say to you, you will never get out till you have paid the last penny.
Again, only spoken of in the Mosaic laws 27: "You have heard that it was said, `You shall not commit adultery.' 28: But I say to you that every one who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart. 29: If your right eye causes you to sin, pluck it out and throw it away; it is better that you lose one of your members than that your whole body be thrown into hell. 30: And if your right hand causes you to sin, cut it off and throw it away; it is better that you lose one of your members than that your whole body go into hell.
This seems to me to just be commentary on the 10th commandment.
31: "It was also said, `Whoever divorces his wife, let him give her a certificate of divorce.' 32: But I say to you that every one who divorces his wife, except on the ground of unchastity, makes her an adulteress; and whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery.
Again, purely Mosaic laws.
33: "Again you have heard that it was said to the men of old, `You shall not swear falsely, but shall perform to the Lord what you have sworn.' 34: But I say to you, Do not swear at all, either by heaven, for it is the throne of God, 35: or by the earth, for it is his footstool, or by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the great King. 36: And do not swear by your head, for you cannot make one hair white or black. 37: Let what you say be simply `Yes' or `No'; anything more than this comes from evil. And, again, expounding one of the ten commandments.So, Yeshua is not only speaking of the Ten Commandments here. He is speaking of , which in my opinion is the Ten Commandments, and everything following is commentary. Detailed instructions. I don't think they are seperable. I don't think it can be said that Yeshua was saying he merely needed to fulfill the Ten Commandments before things were finished. What about the prophecies about Him, that only He Himself could fulfill for the plan of redemption? None of those are listed in the Ten Commandments. And what about Yom Kippur and Sukkoth? If Yeshua has already fulfilled the full ten commandments, then if I understand you right, Yeshua could have come back by now, everything would be accomplished. Yet, it is parts of the , the "Mosaic laws" which have not yet been accomplished. By your reckoning, all of the yots and tittles, not to mention everything else, have been done away with and you might as well throw out the book of Revelation and anything else occurring after the resurrection and assention, because all is finished. The is the ten commandments expounded along with history showing how things went when was being followed and not being followed, and prophecy to help us to know what is to come (and don't let us forget the pretty poetry). The Mosaic laws are YHVH's laws and Yeshua was bound by all of them to fulfill the requirements of the perfect sacrifice, the paschal lamb and atoning sacrifice....neither of which are mentioned in the ten commandments, but both being YHVH's laws. Shalom, Messimom
|
|
Pioneer
Full Member
Shema and Shemar
Posts: 210
|
Post by Pioneer on Jul 26, 2006 14:19:31 GMT -8
Lately, I have been reading along just enjoying the posts and knowledge I have gained from those more learned from me. Anything I have personally disagreed with I have said nothing about, deferring to those who can put it so much more eloquently. However, this time I feel compelled to disagree based on my limited knowledge. Maybe I'm wrong, but I'm going to present my understanding for consideration. I know many of you simply look up the verses presented and go from there, but I like to have the verses included for easier discussion, so bear with me please. 21: "You have heard that it was said to the men of old, `You shall not kill; and whoever kills shall be liable to judgment.' 22: But I say to you that every one who is angry with his brother shall be liable to judgment; whoever insults his brother shall be liable to the council, and whoever says, `You fool!' shall be liable to the hell of fire.
Do not murder--comandment $#6. Punishment for commandment number six listed.....not there. The punishment given by Yeshua here ( judgment by council/hell of fire) is listed nowhere in the Ten commandments, it is listed in the "Mosaic laws"
23: So if you are offering your gift at the altar, and there remember that your brother has something against you, 24: leave your gift there before the altar and go; first be reconciled to your brother, and then come and offer your gift.
The altar sacrifices are only listed and detailed in the Mosaic laws. The ten commandments have nothing to say about the sacrificial system.
25: Make friends quickly with your accuser, while you are going with him to court, lest your accuser hand you over to the judge, and the judge to the guard, and you be put in prison; 26: truly, I say to you, you will never get out till you have paid the last penny.
Again, only spoken of in the Mosaic laws 27: "You have heard that it was said, `You shall not commit adultery.' 28: But I say to you that every one who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart. 29: If your right eye causes you to sin, pluck it out and throw it away; it is better that you lose one of your members than that your whole body be thrown into hell. 30: And if your right hand causes you to sin, cut it off and throw it away; it is better that you lose one of your members than that your whole body go into hell.
This seems to me to just be commentary on the 10th commandment.
31: "It was also said, `Whoever divorces his wife, let him give her a certificate of divorce.' 32: But I say to you that every one who divorces his wife, except on the ground of unchastity, makes her an adulteress; and whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery.
Again, purely Mosaic laws.
33: "Again you have heard that it was said to the men of old, `You shall not swear falsely, but shall perform to the Lord what you have sworn.' 34: But I say to you, Do not swear at all, either by heaven, for it is the throne of God, 35: or by the earth, for it is his footstool, or by Jerusalem, for it is the city of the great King. 36: And do not swear by your head, for you cannot make one hair white or black. 37: Let what you say be simply `Yes' or `No'; anything more than this comes from evil. And, again, expounding one of the ten commandments.So, Yeshua is not only speaking of the Ten Commandments here. He is speaking of , which in my opinion is the Ten Commandments, and everything following is commentary. Detailed instructions. I don't think they are seperable. I don't think it can be said that Yeshua was saying he merely needed to fulfill the Ten Commandments before things were finished. What about the prophecies about Him, that only He Himself could fulfill for the plan of redemption? None of those are listed in the Ten Commandments. And what about Yom Kippur and Sukkoth? If Yeshua has already fulfilled the full ten commandments, then if I understand you right, Yeshua could have come back by now, everything would be accomplished. Yet, it is parts of the , the "Mosaic laws" which have not yet been accomplished. By your reckoning, all of the yots and tittles, not to mention everything else, have been done away with and you might as well throw out the book of Revelation and anything else occurring after the resurrection and assention, because all is finished. The is the ten commandments expounded along with history showing how things went when was being followed and not being followed, and prophecy to help us to know what is to come (and don't let us forget the pretty poetry). The Mosaic laws are YHVH's laws and Yeshua was bound by all of them to fulfill the requirements of the perfect sacrifice, the paschal lamb and atoning sacrifice....neither of which are mentioned in the ten commandments, but both being YHVH's laws. Shalom, Messimom deferring to those who can put it so much more eloquently. You don't need to defer, you did it quite eloquently, even if I do say so myself! It is the "Word of God", repeat Mt. 4:4! Shalom
|
|
|
Post by Nachshon on Jul 30, 2006 19:21:23 GMT -8
I think is the right word to use here...since is the Aramaic word used. Also, in Jeremiah 31 YHWH claims ownership of the , and throughout reading the it is clear to whom it belongs. In Romans 10:6-8, as well as John 1:14, it is made clear that Yeshua is actually living . I do not make any distinction between the Ten Commandments and the other commandments that YHWH has given us to live by, with the sole exception that the Ten are the chief among them. Shalom, David
|
|
|
Post by Mark on Aug 2, 2006 3:28:13 GMT -8
If the Law of Moses and the Law of God are two different sets of Law, is not Deuteronomy 4:2 a contradiction?
You shall not add to the word that I command you, nor take from it, that you may keep the commandments of the LORD your God that I command you. (Deuteronomy 4:2)
|
|
Curt
Full Member
Posts: 136
|
Post by Curt on Aug 2, 2006 17:36:17 GMT -8
Curt: No, because Moses is telling men not to add or take away. Moses is also speaking of the commandments of God. Deuteronomy 4:2 2 You shall not add to the word which I command you, nor take from it, that you may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you Curt: If you read on in Deuteronomy 4:12-13 you also see which commandments Moses is speaking of. Deuteronomy 4:12-13 12 And the LORD spoke to you out of the midst of the fire. You heard the sound of the words, but saw no form; you only heard a voice. 13 So He declared to you His covenant which He commanded you to perform, the Ten Commandments; and He wrote them on two tablets of stone Curt: It is God who authorized the adding of Moses Law 400 years after the already existing Ten Commandments. God added it because of transgressions (sin) Galatians 3:17 17 And this I say, that the law, which was four hundred and thirty years later, cannot annul the covenant that was confirmed before by God in Christ, that it should make the promise of no effect
Curt: God added it because of transgressions (sin)
Galatians 3:19 19 What purpose then does the law serve? It was added because of transgressions, till the Seed should come to whom the promise was made; and it was appointed through angels by the hand of a mediator
Curt: Moses Law was added till the Seed should come (Jesus) God clearly says in Galatians Moses Law was only to last until Jesus came.
Galatians 3:19 19 What purpose then does the law serve? It was added because of transgressions, till the Seed should come to whom the promise was made; and it was appointed through angels by the hand of a mediator
Curt: Moses Law specifically ended when Jesus was nailed to the cross.
Colossians 2:14 14 having wiped out the handwriting of requirements that was against us, which was contrary to us. And He has taken it out of the way, having nailed it to the cross.
So you see it isn't this man who has added or taken away but God Himself.
|
|
Pioneer
Full Member
Shema and Shemar
Posts: 210
|
Post by Pioneer on Aug 2, 2006 18:27:22 GMT -8
Curt; I almost believe you when you say God can change ! Yes, he could, has the ability, he is all powerful. But the most profound situation is He said his is perfect, He is perfect, He is Just. To give an impossibe edict to the Children of Israel only to change his edict to Christians, is far, far from a just God. I'm sure you have heard this before, but it bears repeating, The was nailed to the cross, but not the book of the Law, the living Word of God/ /Yeshua. The handwritings of ordinances that were against us is the bill of trespasses, handwritten by an Angel who records your every word and trangression, were taken to the cross by our savior, those were the false charges he took upon himself for your and my benefit! God is unchanging! So you see I can't see how you can have him change.
|
|
|
Post by messimom on Aug 3, 2006 0:54:06 GMT -8
Curt it looks as if you are using Galations out of context here. It is made perfectly clear in the beginning of the epistle that he is talking to a bunch of people who are again putting themselves under the curse of the law for salvation. Therefore, it follows that the rest of the letter all he is addressing is the use of the law to justify righteousness and salvation. Thanks to translation, it does look later on as if he is dismissing the law altogether, but that is not the case. (my emphasis added) In Gal 3:17 he is talking of the covenant with Avraham. The Ten Commandments were given to Moses within the same time period as the . (Exodus 20:1-22)(Deuteronomy 4:13-14) He is saying that the law given to Moses did not annul the promise of faith. The law was never meant to be a ticket into heaven. Jumping ahead to Gal 4:9-10: Now, in these two verses it appears that Paul is attacking the festivals, new moons, and the sabbath. (see BLB for break down of verse) That can't be. The "fall" festivals have not yet been realized, and the sabbath is commandment #4. So, we know it can't be possible that Paul has been actually saying that the law is now invalid. So, it must be something else. What is the logical conclusion? Shalom Messimom
|
|