Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 6, 2014 2:02:00 GMT -8
Whilst evangelizing one day, the Lord spoke to me in prophecy to write a tract about the triple-6 chip. This is a tract showing world events taking place in the world today on a scientific, technological,economic and social level, and how these events are fulfilling biblical end-times prophecy.
We are now living in the end times where all things are being brought to fulfillment. This message is no longer science fiction (to the world), but is being fulfilled and implemented according to what the bible prophesied 2000 years ago. This tract has been received by almost everyone we share it with, and can open many doors to share the gospel to those who normally wouldnt listen - it is a message that is relevent for all peoples of all nations.
Please download this tract freely and share with others so that they are brought to this accountability of the fullfilment of end times biblical prophetic truth - and to help save them from hell and the lake of fire.
This tract is strategic / effctive because:
1. The Lord prophesied to me, as well as another prophet to write it. 2. It shows clear-cut proof of the bible 3. It shows proof of biblical prophecy. 4. It is a tract that can be given to anyone. 5. It is simple, not compicated information. To download - please click here:
www.mediafire.com/download/y07n44okhhkojoa/666+Tract.zip
God Bless
Shalom, fellow Covenant keepers. The Lord wants you to remember what Jesus told us."Whosoever has my teaching has me, whosoever goes further ,or tries to go further does not have me." And did he not say "Therefore I tell you, do not be anxious about your life, what you will eat or what you will drink, nor about your body, what you will put on. Is not life more than food, and the body more than clothing? Look at the birds of the air: they neither sow nor reap nor gather into barns, and yet your heavenly Father feeds them. Are you not of more value than they? And which of you by being anxious can add a single hour to his span of life? And why are you anxious about clothing? Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow: they neither toil nor spin, yet I tell you, even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these." With this sentiments in mind how can you direct people to a book like revelations with all it's horror. Rather the transcripts of the Law and the accounts of Jesus, who told us to obey the commandments if we wanted to attain eternal life.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 6, 2014 2:15:28 GMT -8
... "9 A third angel followed them and said in a loud voice: “If anyone worships the beast and its image and receives its mark on their forehead or on their hand, 10 they, too, will drink the wine of God’s fury," ... Now let’s be reasonable here Firstly it clearly says "mark on their forehead or on their hand" now I don't see how anyone can receive a spiritual mark on their hand or forehead. Debarim (Deu) 6:8 "Tie them as symbols on your hands and bind them on your foreheads." Yet you just quoted Hazon (Rev) 14:9, which clearly says there will be an element of worship to the taking of the mark; a thing which you rightly pointed out God takes very seriously! It doesn't matter what the machine scans- you were doomed from the moment you bowed and worshiped the beast. This is between you and God, not you and the cashier. It is the worship, even though done under duress, that dooms you, not the mark. Look at it another way: if the mark were all that was important, the beast could just have his minions strap you down and mark you. It is worship he desires- a thing due only to God! Dan C How can you give desolation as advice? "Dooms you"? What kind of Christian are you? The enemy is becoming more and more determined to make people think they've crossed that line and there is no way back. Why are you helping? When Jesus said the greatest sign given would be the sign of Jonah, did he not mean repentance? Please be careful not to make it difficult for the weak in spirit. And be careful with this tome, it is full of confusion.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 6, 2014 2:25:08 GMT -8
The system for the mark is already in place...the moment they go to digital money, we will all be imprisoned in that system. And since all coinage is only relevant if other people trust it sufficiently to use in their trading, your credit card/food ID will be your lifeline, unless you have gold or silver, and buy on the black market, or trade your talents directly for produce/clothes.
The system however is only for enforcement of the spirit submission to the Beast to get that all important World Wide ID card with data strip; metal bracelet with chip; or ring with chip (already in use in Europe) etc.
The IRS enforcement of Obamacare simply ties each person more into the system. But that is not the mark. The worship will get you the card/bracelet/ring/implant, probably with very visible tattoo so that everyone knows you are a 'good guy', not those terrible haters over there (us), and then it won't matter any more.
I happily use the means of the system to pay my bills just like anyone else...it is only technology.
When they bring the worship part up, that is where I dig in my feet, and say...I'd rather die, thank you.
I don't particularly fancy being here on the planet past the earthquake (national/economic/natural or all three) in Seal 6 anyway...but that's another whole thread or ten. Is there not a chip in every mobile handset on general sale? That you can use now to pay for items online or soon in shops? This will come out of your talk time. meaning soon everything will be linked to what is on that chip. Is that not worship? Read deuteronomy, the great choice. These things run on destruction, if it wasn't for radiation that is innately destructive, these things would not work. i DON'T HAVE A HANDSET is the key point here. Choose Life.
|
|
|
Post by alon on May 6, 2014 3:29:38 GMT -8
How can you give desolation as advice? "Dooms you"? What kind of Christian are you? An honest one, and a Messianic, which means I take a realistic view of scripture. Since you are new, it was relatively easy to scan through your posts. Take this one, for example: Heb 9:22 "And almost all things are by the law purged with blood; and without shedding of blood is no remission."Or this one: I bring these up because they show a mindset of we should look at scripture with rose colored glasses, ignoring the things that make us uneasy. But God revealed these things to John and the apostles, and they were duly recorded for a reason. He wants us to know them. Your admonishment to us to ignore them is ill conceived, at the very least. I agree with you here. For the time being there is always hope, as long as we will repent and follow God. However, in that time I see strong warnings for those who would take the mark and worship the beast: Rev 19:20 "And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone."
Rev 16:2 "And the first went, and poured out his vial upon the earth; and there fell a noisome and grievous sore upon the men which had the mark of the beast, and upon them which worshipped his image." Rev 14:11 "And the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever: and they have no rest day nor night, who worship the beast and his image, and whosoever receiveth the mark of his name." Of course! If you had bothered to read the posts here you'd know I talk of repentance often. However we must also be aware of the penalties for non-repentance. God included these warnings in His word, and that is why I am "helping." As for the confusion, well, the only way to sort this out is to openly and prayerfully discuss this (Revelation?) and other "tomes." This is best done with clear lenses and no blinders. Sorry if this upsets you, but I'm not the one who told John about the end times. Dan C btw: welcome to the forum!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 6, 2014 4:16:49 GMT -8
To the Law and the testimony, for if they speak not according to these they have not the light of dawn. Take care therefore with so purported writings of a roman born pharisee who liked to dismiss the Law. Thank you for the welcome btw.
|
|
|
Post by alon on May 6, 2014 4:50:28 GMT -8
To the Law and the testimony, for if they speak not according to these they have not the light of dawn. Take care therefore with so purported writings of a roman born pharisee who liked to dismiss the Law. Thank you for the welcome btw. You're welcome. You might want to go to the "Introduce Yourself!" section and tell us a bit about yourself. Roman born Pharisee? Rav Sha'ul? He was apparently born a Roman; Acts 22:28b "Paul said, "But I am a citizen by birth."" But he was first and foremost Hebrew, and a Pharisee. Act 23:6 "But when Paul perceived that the one part were Sadducees, and the other Pharisees, he cried out in the council, Men and brethren, I am a Pharisee, the son of a Pharisee: of the hope and resurrection of the dead I am called in question." Being a Pharisee was not necessarily a bad thing, despite what mainC teaches. They were merely one of the dominant sects at the time. Since Rav Sha'ul maintained he was a Pharisee long after his conversion, to say this makes you bad is to say Yeshua made a mistake in calling Sha'ul; and we know this cannot be. I'd also take exception to the statement that he "liked to dismiss the law." I don't think he ever did, however his writings were corrupted both by translators and by the teachings of catholic and mainC dogma to sound this way. There are several threads on this here already, so I won't go into detail now. And the vision of Revelation was given to John. I don't recall anywhere we are given his affiliation with any sect. He certainly never dismissed the law. Dan C
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 6, 2014 5:37:16 GMT -8
He said Pharisee not Hebrew. Judging by the names, the romans had infiltrated the Pharisees, and started the desolatery sect, the sadducees.
|
|
|
Post by alon on May 6, 2014 6:34:07 GMT -8
He said Pharisee not Hebrew. Judging by the names, the romans had infiltrated the Pharisees, and started the desolatery sect, the sadducees. Acts 22:3 "I am a Jew, born in Tarsus of Cilicia, but brought up in this city and trained at the feet of Gamli'el in every detail of the of our forefathers. I was a zealot for God, as all of you are today." There, he said "I am a Jew." I agree that the Romans had placed their own puppets in the leadership of the Jews. I don't see where the Romans created the Sadducees, however. Dan C edit: just to note- being a Pharisee would imply you were Jewish/Hebrew, as it is a sect of the Hebrew faith.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 6, 2014 6:50:49 GMT -8
All this would only be convincing me if I believed that acts was a coherent text.
This is getting off the subject of this thread. What about my posts on this subject anon?
|
|
|
Post by alon on May 6, 2014 6:59:18 GMT -8
All this would only be convincing me if I believed that acts was a coherent text. This is getting off the subject of this thread. What about my posts on this subject anon? I have answered every post you addressed to me. You, on the other hand, have not answered all of mine; and where you have answered you've been argumentative and made remarks you apparently cannot substantiate. Now you seek to deflect, implying I am the one who has not answered. So the next question is why are you here? To argue? To tell me what I believe? To question God? Dan C
|
|
|
Post by jimmie on May 6, 2014 7:00:18 GMT -8
All this would only be convincing me if I believed that acts was a coherent text. Alon, Check mate. Seeing that you also believe that the text has been tampered with, how can you use it to prove any thing. Jimmie
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 6, 2014 7:11:35 GMT -8
Now you are dodging the issue. What i first posted on this thread you have not acknowledged, so please back down until you have read this. Though you have been answered on the most important issues. Like your accusation that i was making up doctrine as i went along. The Lord will not see a man's descendants punished for sins that were not their own. How could you even suggest this? When the House of Ahab was destroyed by Jehu and Jehonadab it was for sins that they were committing against The Lord themselves. To suggest that the Lord would destroy a man's descendants as payment for his righteousness, is perverse and blasphemous.
|
|
|
Post by alon on May 6, 2014 7:16:15 GMT -8
Now you are dodging the issue. What i first posted on this thread you have not acknowledged, so please back down until you have read this. Though you have been answered on the most important issues. Like your accusation that i was making up doctrine as i went along. The Lord will not see a man's descendants punished for sins that were not their own. How could you even suggest this? When the House of Ahab was destroyed by Jehu and Jehonadab it was for sins that they were committing against The Lord themselves. To suggest that the Lord would destroy a man's descendants as payment for his righteousness, is perverse and blasphemous. What about David's son? You should know the TNK better than this ... Dan C
|
|
|
Post by alon on May 6, 2014 7:53:35 GMT -8
All this would only be convincing me if I believed that acts was a coherent text. Alon, Check mate. Seeing that you also believe that the text has been tampered with, how can you use it to prove any thing. Jimmie I believe there has been tampering in some places, however the truth is still there if we look. bongo apparently believes much of it was never true or inspired. There's a huge difference. I can use scripture because I bother to take the time and look for the truth, as opposed to his just throwing out whatever he doesn't like. Queen to Rook 1- checkmate. Dan ( really I'm Bobby Fisher) C
|
|
|
Post by jimmie on May 6, 2014 10:01:42 GMT -8
119:89 LAMED. For ever, O LORD, thy word is settled in heaven.
Unless it has been tampered with?
|
|